ASE 2027 Annual Conference

The initial learning about biological organism, naming, form and function,  begins in the earliest  years before any formal learning facilitation and  builds on the child’s understanding. These foundations are rarely discussed in training and with communities. This talk will cover how earliest learners construct undemanding of themselves and other organisms in form, function and habitat. This knowledge is from research, teaching and observations.  Learners   learn their biology beginning with  experiencing their needs and actions as a biological organisms. Such understanding forms the basis of their subsequent interpretation of species and is the basis of subsequent anthropomorphic interpretations. Their interactions and observations of the Environment and organisms, contributes to their understanding  in three categories, identified from everyday environment  Applying a grounded theory analysis of the observations they made and what caught their interest, and on their narratives verbal and actions.  These categories emerged:

1. NAMING and HABITATS - identification of organisms, naming, personal names, everyday names and scientific perhaps, locations, criterial attributes.

2. SYSTEMS - interrelationships horizontally and vertically.

3. TIME – much is not instant - germination, dimension, evolution, life cycles, change in form and function which for the early years is a very difficult idea. Identify the sequence in which names, form, function and behaviours are learnt.

The learner’s understanding develops progressively with age and opportunities to observe and interact with plant and animals. As children are biological beings, they acquire an understanding of basic life functions from first-hand experience as well as a rudimentary understanding of the biological form and function of organisms in their relationship with the environment, (Ghazili and Tolmie, 2014).

In the first quarter of the 21st century, the situation has not improved since educational researchers wrote in at the turn of the century that’ insufficient work has not been done on how children view living organisms in their environment ,Tunnicliffe and Reiss, 1999a). Such acquisition of understanding is in stages. From the first image animal shape in a soft toy replicating an animal to sightings in the environment, or images on various media. And Plant sightings in their everyday. lants are frequently neglected in formal study, there id still a ‘plant blindness’ (Wandersee and Schussler, 2001).

As the. Early leaner meets various organisms they acquire some understanding which is extended through formal teaching. Young children name animals and plants. Usually the first name becomes the superordinate category. For example, if the first object noticed and named in the sky is bird, anything else observed thereafter, e.g. a plane is called ‘bird’. Similarly green ‘objects’ that do not move around are ‘plants’, subcategories referred to by everyday names such as weeds, fruits, vegetables, flowers, trees. grass . This learning persists often in everyday life for use however, despite subsequent teaching. Learning about the biological world is crucial in developing understanding   and action in managing a sustainable world (Tunnicliffe and Reiss, 1999) but there is a long way to go yet.

The session presents a research-informed reconceptualisation of the quadrat through two complementary lenses.
First, informed by Barad’s agential realism and sociomaterial perspectives, we consider how tools actively shape knowledge, attention, and experience. Through iterative design and reflection, we have developed approaches that disrupt conventional ecological practices, incorporating art (e.g. Dürer’s Great Piece of Turf), narrative, and structured noticing to broaden engagement with ecological complexity.

Second, LCT (Maton), particularly its semantic dimension, offers a framework for analysing how learning moves between concrete experiences and abstract concepts. In ecology, this involves shifts between everyday observations and disciplinary language. Examining these shifts across classroom and field contexts helps explain how knowledge and disciplinary understanding develop. This work builds on Sanders and Davies (2023) and aligns with current priorities in science education.

Participant Experience
Participants will rethink the quadrat as a tool for exploring ecosystems, interdependence, scale, and human–environment relationships. Drawing on Barad and Maton, we examine how every pedagogical choice creates an “agential cut,” foregrounding certain aspects of the natural world while excluding others.

Participants will engage with the Toothpick Safari, a flexible, narrative-based alternative to traditional quadrat work. Examples from school and teacher education contexts show how this approach encourages richer discussions about interdependence, multiple scales (micro to macro), deep time, evolution, and human impact.

The session models how uncertainty and open-ended inquiry can be productive in teaching, supporting deeper ecological understanding. Participants will also reflect critically on their own use of tools, tasks, and instructions.

Outcomes - by the end of the session, participants will be able to:

Recognise the agential cuts within their teaching practices

Use quadrats to support narrative, relational, and inquiry-based learning

Design adaptable outdoor activities that prioritise noticing over counting

Explain how material tools shape what counts as knowledge in science

Connect classroom and outdoor learning to support ecological understanding and disciplinary language development.

This session supports teachers, teacher educators, and outdoor learning practitioners to rethink the quadrat as more than a measuring device, positioning it instead as a tool for ecological inquiry. Participants will explore how Karen Barad’s concepts of agential cuts and intra-action can deepen outdoor science learning, and how Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), particularly semantics, helps explain shifts between classroom preparation, fieldwork, and follow-up meaning-making.

Through first-hand, narrative-based approaches, participants will experience alternatives to traditional quadrat activities used with school students and pre-service teachers. The session also invites critical reflection on how teaching decisions influence what students notice, value, and come to understand in ecology.

This work arises from concerns that ecology teaching often prioritises counting and sampling over relationships, meaning-making, and ecological thinking. Drawing on collaborative work across teacher education contexts in London and Gothenburg, involving both pre-service teachers and school students, we began to question the pedagogical role of familiar tools such as quadrats.

This session will explore how the practical Barcoding For Beginners project is being used to investigate invertebrate biodiversity with learners in years 10-13. Hear about the impact of authentic scientific investigation and collaboration on educators and students and see the resources available to support this inquiry-based project using molecular biology techniques, bioinformatics and transferable skills.

Launched in September 2024, Barcoding For Beginners is a project by Wellcome Connecting Science, funded by a Royal Society SEED Partnership grant. It provided funded CPD for eligible educators, a series of resources, equipment and consumables to support a 10 hour DNA barcoding project in the classroom. This session will discuss the findings from this two year project and examine the impact on educators and learners of completing inquiry-based science, using molecular biology equipment, supported by scientists in the field.

This session will discuss and showcase:
• how DNA barcoding has been used in schools and FE colleges for practical, inquiry-based projects investigating invertebrate biodiversity in years 10 - 13
• how using practical project work can enhance understanding of molecular biology techniques in the curriculum
• the positive engagement of educators and technical staff with Barcoding for beginners CPD and resources
• the impact on practical molecular biology ability, transferable skills and career awareness in participating students
• one of the bioinformatics exercises to showcase how interrogating open access databases can be used in teaching

Attendees will:
• understand the structure and impact of the Barcoding for beginners programme and how it can be applied in school and colleges
• hear about the impact the practical investigations had on students engagement with molecular biology and bioinformatics and their development of practical skills.
• discuss how a DNA barcoding project fits with the curriculum and can be integrated into teaching
•t rial a bioinformatics element from the project to demonstrate how the project can enhance students’ domain-specific skills

This interactive session will explore how collaborative, cross-institutional communities of practice can support higher education science educators in responding to emerging pedagogical challenges. The session will introduce the collaborative work of the BERG Higher Education Working Group through two current thematic areas: AI and assessment and decolonising the curriculum.

Through a series of short reflective case studies and emerging examples from participating HEIs, contributors will share approaches, challenges, and ongoing questions relating to inclusive curricula, assessment design, and the impact of generative AI on teaching and learning.

Participants will then be invited to discuss their own institutional experiences, challenges, and priorities within these areas. The session will encourage collaborative dialogue across disciplines and institutions, recognising that many of these challenges extend beyond bioscience education alone.

The session will conclude with a shared reflection on the role of collaborative networks and communities of practice in supporting responsive, inclusive, and evidence-informed approaches to science education in higher education.

Outcomes: - Participants will be able to:

Share current challenges and emerging practices relating to AI, assessment, and inclusive curricula within higher education science education.

Reflect on how different HEIs are responding to shared pedagogical and curricular challenges.

Discuss opportunities and barriers associated with collaborative approaches to educational change.

Consider how cross-institutional communities of practice can support ongoing professional dialogue and development.

Higher education science educators are navigating rapid pedagogical, curricular, and technological change. In response to shared challenges across the sector, members of the Biology Education Research Group (BERG) Higher Education Working Group, part of the Royal Society of Biology, established collaborative thematic groups focused on AI and assessment, and decolonising the curriculum. These groups bring together educators and academics from multiple HEIs to share practice, reflect on emerging challenges, and explore approaches to inclusive and responsive science education.

Biology is full of phenomena that seem almost unbelievable: fish that shoot jets of water to catch prey, fungi that manipulate insect behaviour, mammals with unusual resistance to disease, plants that trap animals, and organisms capable of remarkable regeneration. Yet these examples are far more than curiosities. Used thoughtfully, they can become powerful tools for teaching fundamental ideas such as adaptation, natural selection, transport, communication, homeostasis, ecology and disease.

This session will showcase a range of striking biological examples most suitable for Key Stages 4 - 5. For each example, participants will consider the core concept it helps to teach, why it is memorable, and how it might be introduced through images, short video clips, questioning, retrieval practice or discussion. Examples will be chosen to show how a single case study can often be adapted for different ages and levels of prior knowledge.
The session will also explore principles for selecting effective examples: ensuring clear curriculum relevance, avoiding novelty for novelty’s sake, linking surprising contexts back to core biological ideas, and using examples to deepen understanding rather than replace it.

Delegates will leave with a bank of ready-to-use examples alongside a practical framework for identifying and evaluating further case studies of their own. Whether teaching GCSE or A-level biology, participants should gain ideas that can be implemented immediately to enrich lessons and strengthen student learning.

As a result of attending, participants will be able to:

• select unusual biological examples that align clearly with curriculum concepts from KS4 to post-16;
• use images, short clips and questioning to turn examples into effective teaching episodes;
• explain how curiosity, relevance and novelty can support memory and engagement;
• adapt examples for different age groups, specifications and levels of prior knowledge;
• identify further case studies that can enrich their own biology curriculum.

This session is grounded in a combination of classroom practice, cognitive science, subject-specific pedagogy and professional reflection.

In this interactive session, participants will be invited to join a community of experienced educators with plant-based interests, but the session will cater for all levels of experience and expertise. Participants will, for example, have the opportunity to review creative and inspiring plant practicals to engage their classes with plant science and learn about current best pedagogy for the classroom. Participants will also have the opportunity to get involved in an emerging plant science education community to join up secondary and higher education.

The 50-minute session divided as follows

0-40 minutes – 4 x Lightning presentations by multiple presenters sharing good practice, organisations and resources for researchers and educators to take away, use, develop and adapt in their own teaching. Attendees will have the opportunity and be encouraged to record questions from these sessions for a Q& A and plenary at the end. Participants will be divided into groups to discuss and share good practice and their views on what is needed to advance the teaching of plants in schools including areas such as specific support and resources needed plus areas for future research. These will be fed back and captured on a Padlet and will be used to identify barriers to plant science education in the classroom and guide future research and solutions. This will provide the means to advance plant science education considering educator feedback.

Outcomes: After attending, participants will be able to:

> Utilise and share current best practice, research and resources in plant science education
> Identify and access key plant science education organisations and projects
> Join, or be able to refer to, a community of other educators interested in plant science
> Co-create recommendations to inform future research and support

This session will be run by the BERG Plant Science Education Working group. The group, set up in March 2025, comprises of a diverse range of educators, researchers and representatives of plant-related organisations. We recognise the fundamental need to share positive plant teaching practices, shape learning opportunities, and research to improve plant science education in general.

This interactive session will explore how disciplinary literacy can be embedded into post-16 science curricula to support learners in moving beyond the memorisation of key terms towards reading, writing, reasoning and communicating like scientists.

The session draws on work developed at Milton Keynes College Group within a growing sixth form context, where disciplinary literacy has been used as a curriculum design principle across A Level and Applied Science provision. The approach was developed in response to a familiar post-16 challenge: learners may know isolated scientific vocabulary, but struggle to interpret exam questions, explain processes precisely, evaluate evidence, or communicate using the conventions of the discipline. Drawing on research-informed practice in disciplinary literacy, curriculum design, and assessment, the session will show how science teachers can make the hidden demands of scientific reading, writing, and thinking more explicit.

Participants will examine examples of how diagnostic questions can reveal gaps in conceptual understanding, command-word interpretation, and scientific reasoning. The session will also consider how independent study booklets and structured writing tasks can help learners practise the forms of explanation, evaluation and evidence use required in Biology, Chemistry and Forensic Science. There will also be a demonstration of tools which are used to identify specific AO gaps which relate to terminology/application of language and how we address it.

During the session, participants will be able to review sample resources, view the tools we use and given time to consider how similar approaches could be adapted for their own phase, subject or qualification context.

By the end of the session, participants will be able to:

1. Identify the specific literacy demands within post-16 science tasks;
2. Distinguish between teaching scientific vocabulary and developing disciplinary scientific thinking.
3. Use diagnostic questions to uncover barriers to scientific understanding.
4. Adapt examples of disciplinary literacy resources for Biology, Chemistry, Forensic Science or related pathways.
5. Consider how disciplinary literacy can support curriculum planning for academic, applied and future technical science routes.

The session is intended for science teachers, curriculum leaders, post-16 practitioners and anyone interested in strengthening students’ access to complex scientific knowledge through practical, evidence-informed pedagogy.