ASE 2027 Annual Conference

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries, please email [email protected]

This session explores how Micro: bit technology can be used alongside case studies and practical classroom activities to help students investigate how diseases spread.

Developed during the COVID pandemic through collaborative teacher learning, the approach was designed to model both airborne and more traditional contact-based transmission. Participants will see how these activities can support engagement with current, real-world science through problem solving, discussion, and enquiry.

The session will share the background to the work, outline how the activities were developed for classroom use, and demonstrate how Micro: bits and disease-transmission scenarios can be used to promote STEM learning and scientific sensemaking. Resources will be shared digitally with attendees.

1. Use case studies and Micro: bit technology to engage students in investigating disease transmission through relevant, real-world contexts.
2. Plan opportunities for students to apply science inquiry and problem-solving approaches as they analyse evidence and identify possible sources of infection.
3. Adapt an integrative STEM activity that supports exploration, sensemaking, and discussion of disease transmission in the classroom.

Join the team working with the Department for Education to develop the reformed Science Programmes of Study in England and GCSEs subject content as we outline the priorities and evidence underpinning the drafting process. This session focuses on Biology at KS3 and KS4 plus transition from KS2 and KS1.

Please note the other sessions in the conference programme, on KS1 and KS2, and on chemistry and physics at KS3 and KS4.

There continues to be a physics teacher recruit and retention crisis across the nations of the UK.  
There is little point in governments investing heavily in teacher recruitment if qualified teachers then leave the profession in large numbers.

With this in mind, Mark Whalley and Stuart Farmer have conducted research in both England and Scotland into identifying the reasons why physics teachers have recently left the profession. In this session, these reasons will be explored and comparisons made between the situations in Scotland and England, which factors are in common and which are different in the two nations where there has been an increasing divergence in educational policy in the last two decades. How do factors such as accountability and performativity, administrative workload, pupil behaviour, relationships with colleagues, and career progression routes impact on teacher wellbeing and their decisions to stay or leave teaching?

The session presents a research-informed reconceptualisation of the quadrat through two complementary lenses.
First, informed by Barad’s agential realism and sociomaterial perspectives, we consider how tools actively shape knowledge, attention, and experience. Through iterative design and reflection, we have developed approaches that disrupt conventional ecological practices, incorporating art (e.g. Dürer’s Great Piece of Turf), narrative, and structured noticing to broaden engagement with ecological complexity.

Second, LCT (Maton), particularly its semantic dimension, offers a framework for analysing how learning moves between concrete experiences and abstract concepts. In ecology, this involves shifts between everyday observations and disciplinary language. Examining these shifts across classroom and field contexts helps explain how knowledge and disciplinary understanding develop. This work builds on Sanders and Davies (2023) and aligns with current priorities in science education.

Participant Experience
Participants will rethink the quadrat as a tool for exploring ecosystems, interdependence, scale, and human–environment relationships. Drawing on Barad and Maton, we examine how every pedagogical choice creates an “agential cut,” foregrounding certain aspects of the natural world while excluding others.

Participants will engage with the Toothpick Safari, a flexible, narrative-based alternative to traditional quadrat work. Examples from school and teacher education contexts show how this approach encourages richer discussions about interdependence, multiple scales (micro to macro), deep time, evolution, and human impact.

The session models how uncertainty and open-ended inquiry can be productive in teaching, supporting deeper ecological understanding. Participants will also reflect critically on their own use of tools, tasks, and instructions.

Outcomes - by the end of the session, participants will be able to:

Recognise the agential cuts within their teaching practices

Use quadrats to support narrative, relational, and inquiry-based learning

Design adaptable outdoor activities that prioritise noticing over counting

Explain how material tools shape what counts as knowledge in science

Connect classroom and outdoor learning to support ecological understanding and disciplinary language development.

This session supports teachers, teacher educators, and outdoor learning practitioners to rethink the quadrat as more than a measuring device, positioning it instead as a tool for ecological inquiry. Participants will explore how Karen Barad’s concepts of agential cuts and intra-action can deepen outdoor science learning, and how Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), particularly semantics, helps explain shifts between classroom preparation, fieldwork, and follow-up meaning-making.

Through first-hand, narrative-based approaches, participants will experience alternatives to traditional quadrat activities used with school students and pre-service teachers. The session also invites critical reflection on how teaching decisions influence what students notice, value, and come to understand in ecology.

This work arises from concerns that ecology teaching often prioritises counting and sampling over relationships, meaning-making, and ecological thinking. Drawing on collaborative work across teacher education contexts in London and Gothenburg, involving both pre-service teachers and school students, we began to question the pedagogical role of familiar tools such as quadrats.

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries, please email [email protected]

Biology teaching, from global biomes to the regulation of metabolism, has the power to inspire students about the natural world. Since the publication of The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review (2021) and the National Security Assessment on global ecosystems (2026) there is a strong argument for biology teaching having a duty to inspire students and play a role in creating a society fit for the challenges humanity faces.

This session will explore what we can do as members of the biology education community to instil a lifelong love of life in our students. Themes will include inter-relationships between topics, the wonder of biology, scientific thinking skills, and connection to the biology around us.

You will leave with ideas that you can use when planning lessons, developing teaching resources, organising schemes of work, or when influencing the national curriculum and exam specifications.

Session Outcomes:
•Apply at least one new idea to their own lesson planning, resource development or curriculum influence.
•Identify ways to bring wonder, curiosity and real world relevance into everyday lessons or resources.
•Explain why inspiring biology teaching matters for students and society.

Please feel free to attend the sponsored tea/coffee available for Biology educators available after this session on Learning Hub Level 2 foyer outside of rooms 231.

Physics is full of abstract ideas. For many students, these concepts can feel remote and inaccessible. Narrative and analogy offer powerful ways to bridge that gap.

This interactive session will explore how storytelling, models, and analogies can transform the teaching of physics. We will look at classic examples such as the “rope” model of current electricity or the “dice roll” analogy for nuclear decay alongside original classroom tested narratives I have developed. We will discuss how these approaches benefit student learning, from reducing misconceptions to increasing engagement.

We will also consider the limitations of analogies, how encouraging students to recognise where a model breaks down can be beneficial to understanding. Given time, there will be an opportunity for participants to share their own analogies and reflect on how narrative can enrich their teaching practice as well as how AI can play a role in this style of teaching.

Outcomes: By the end of the session, participants will be able to:
•Identify effective uses of narrative, storytelling, models, and analogies in physics teaching.
•Apply at least two new analogies or narratives in their own lessons.
•Evaluate the strengths and limitations of analogies to avoid reinforcing misconceptions.
•Develop strategies to make abstract concepts more memorable and engaging for students aged 11–18.

Background: Over 30 years of teaching physics to students aged 11–18, I have found that physics concepts - from Newton’s laws to nuclear decay - often become more accessible when framed through narrative or analogy. My classroom practice has involved developing stories and models that resonate with learners, drawing on both established teaching analogies and my own creations. These approaches have consistently helped students connect new ideas to prior knowledge, making difficult concepts memorable and meaningful.

If your focus is teaching or supporting biology lessons, come along for a networking session with complimentary tea/coffee and a muffin, to discuss how Miss Estruch Teach & Tell can support your practice!

We'd love to talk about physics education and how we can help you, your school or your MAT - and we've got treats. Join the IOP team to tell us what's going well and what you think we should be doing to support the profession.

This CPD session explores how science teachers can effectively plan for and support strong progression in practical work from KS3 through to KS5. Moving beyond isolated experiments, the session focuses on how practical skills develop over time, building from curiosity and engagement in KS3 to confidence, independence, and precision at A-Level. Teachers will consider how to sequence practical experiences, reinforce key skills, and ensure students are well-prepared for the increasing demands of assessed practical work. The session emphasises the importance of coherence and continuity in developing scientifically skilled and confident learners.

By the end of this session, participants will be able to:
> Identify the key components of effective practical progression from KS3 to KS5.
> Recognise gaps and inconsistencies in students’ practical skills development.
> Apply strategies to support a coherent and purposeful approach to practical work across the curriculum.

The session will explore what effective practical progression looks like across the secondary phase, using examples to highlight how skills can be built and revisited over time. Teachers will engage in activities to map practical skills, analyse current practice, and identify opportunities to strengthen progression. Through discussion and practical approaches, participants will develop strategies to ensure students move from early curiosity to confident, capable practical scientists by the end of KS5.

Curriculum debate across the four nations keeps returning to one question. What is science education for? The answers point towards young people who can ask a good question, weigh evidence and contribute something new. Yet working scientifically is often reduced to practical technique, and the disciplinary knowledge behind real research goes untaught. Where research does appear it is usually optional, so the students who would gain most are least likely to meet it.

The Institute for Research in Schools (IRIS) has worked with over 10,000 students to carry out research. Getting Started with Research is what teachers told us they need to support research and innovation in schools.

What you get: Getting Started with Research is a free lesson programme for students, fully resourced and ready to teach. Lesson plans, slides, worksheets and a knowledge progression map. It builds a shared model of the research cycle, then teaches how researchers find and judge evidence, how curiosity becomes a testable question, who does research, and how students plan an enquiry of their own.

It is designed the way you already plan. Outcomes first, knowledge specified lesson by lesson, misconceptions named, retrieval and modelling built in, reading age controlled. It strengthens working scientifically rather than competing with it, and it maps to the curriculum in all four nations.

Aims and outcomes - In this session we will:

> show why research and innovation are better taught explicitly than left to chance

> walk through the lesson sequence and the knowledge each lesson builds

> show how it fits existing schemes of work, progression pathways and the enrichment you already run

Delegates will leave able to identify where research knowledge is currently assumed rather than taught in their own curriculum, and with free access to the full programme. Time is protected for questions.

This session will explore how the practical Barcoding For Beginners project is being used to investigate invertebrate biodiversity with learners in years 10-13. Hear about the impact of authentic scientific investigation and collaboration on educators and students and see the resources available to support this inquiry-based project using molecular biology techniques, bioinformatics and transferable skills.

Launched in September 2024, Barcoding For Beginners is a project by Wellcome Connecting Science, funded by a Royal Society SEED Partnership grant. It provided funded CPD for eligible educators, a series of resources, equipment and consumables to support a 10 hour DNA barcoding project in the classroom. This session will discuss the findings from this two year project and examine the impact on educators and learners of completing inquiry-based science, using molecular biology equipment, supported by scientists in the field.

This session will discuss and showcase:
• how DNA barcoding has been used in schools and FE colleges for practical, inquiry-based projects investigating invertebrate biodiversity in years 10 - 13
• how using practical project work can enhance understanding of molecular biology techniques in the curriculum
• the positive engagement of educators and technical staff with Barcoding for beginners CPD and resources
• the impact on practical molecular biology ability, transferable skills and career awareness in participating students
• one of the bioinformatics exercises to showcase how interrogating open access databases can be used in teaching

Attendees will:
• understand the structure and impact of the Barcoding for beginners programme and how it can be applied in school and colleges
• hear about the impact the practical investigations had on students engagement with molecular biology and bioinformatics and their development of practical skills.
• discuss how a DNA barcoding project fits with the curriculum and can be integrated into teaching
•t rial a bioinformatics element from the project to demonstrate how the project can enhance students’ domain-specific skills

This session explores research by Axion Maths on the transition from primary to secondary school which can make or break a pupil's attitudes towards maths and school, and EEF research on whether setting is better than mixed ability classes, and prompts discussion questions on whether there are parallels for secondary science.

This session is supported by a Department for Education funded initiative, led by Mathematics in Education and Industry (MEI), in partnership with ASE as part of the Advanced Maths Support Programme (AMSP).

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries, please email [email protected]

This CPD session supports science teachers in developing a deeper understanding of standard demand questions in science assessments. Often forming the core of exam papers, these questions require students to apply knowledge accurately and interpret information with precision. However, many learners struggle to translate their understanding into secure responses.

This session explores what makes standard demand questions challenging and how teachers can better prepare students to meet these expectations. By focusing on the link between knowledge, application, and exam technique, teachers will be equipped to strengthen student performance in this crucial area.

By the end of this session, participants will be able to:
Identify the defining features of standard demand questions in science assessments and mark schemes.
Recognise common student errors, misconceptions, and gaps in application.
Apply strategies to support students in interpreting and responding accurately to standard demand questions.

The session will explore the structure and demands of standard demand questions, using real assessment materials to highlight where students commonly succeed and struggle. Teachers will engage in activities to analyse question types, review authentic student responses, and unpick the skills required for success. Through discussion and practical strategies, participants will develop approaches to help students improve accuracy, confidence, and consistency when tackling this essential component of science assessments.

This interactive session will explore how collaborative, cross-institutional communities of practice can support higher education science educators in responding to emerging pedagogical challenges. The session will introduce the collaborative work of the BERG Higher Education Working Group through two current thematic areas: AI and assessment and decolonising the curriculum.

Through a series of short reflective case studies and emerging examples from participating HEIs, contributors will share approaches, challenges, and ongoing questions relating to inclusive curricula, assessment design, and the impact of generative AI on teaching and learning.

Participants will then be invited to discuss their own institutional experiences, challenges, and priorities within these areas. The session will encourage collaborative dialogue across disciplines and institutions, recognising that many of these challenges extend beyond bioscience education alone.

The session will conclude with a shared reflection on the role of collaborative networks and communities of practice in supporting responsive, inclusive, and evidence-informed approaches to science education in higher education.

Outcomes: - Participants will be able to:

Share current challenges and emerging practices relating to AI, assessment, and inclusive curricula within higher education science education.

Reflect on how different HEIs are responding to shared pedagogical and curricular challenges.

Discuss opportunities and barriers associated with collaborative approaches to educational change.

Consider how cross-institutional communities of practice can support ongoing professional dialogue and development.

Higher education science educators are navigating rapid pedagogical, curricular, and technological change. In response to shared challenges across the sector, members of the Biology Education Research Group (BERG) Higher Education Working Group, part of the Royal Society of Biology, established collaborative thematic groups focused on AI and assessment, and decolonising the curriculum. These groups bring together educators and academics from multiple HEIs to share practice, reflect on emerging challenges, and explore approaches to inclusive and responsive science education.

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries please email [email protected]

Scientific writing is a core disciplinary skill, yet many students struggle to express their understanding clearly and accurately. This session focuses on how departments can build writing successfully over time, rather than addressing it reactively at GCSE.

Participants will explore how careful curriculum sequencing ensures that students develop the knowledge, vocabulary, and structures needed before being asked to write extended responses. The session will consider how writing can be built progressively, moving from oral rehearsal to structured written outcomes.

A central focus will be the role of oracy. Delegates will examine how structured talk, including the use of sentence stems, purposeful questioning, and guided discussion, supports students to clarify their thinking and practise disciplinary language before writing. The importance of consistent routines across a department will be emphasised to ensure coherence for students.

The session will also explore how scaffolds can be used effectively within modelling. Rather than being treated as standalone supports, tools such as writing frames, exemplars, and success criteria will be examined as part of an explicit teaching process. Participants will consider how these scaffolds can be introduced, modelled, and gradually removed to support independence without reducing challenge.

Throughout, there will be a strong emphasis on aligning approaches across Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4 to ensure that students are prepared for the demands of GCSE.

Outcomes
By the end of the session, participants will be able to:
•Explain how scientific writing can be developed progressively through curriculum sequencing
•Identify effective strategies for embedding oracy to support disciplinary writing
•Use scaffolds purposefully within modelling to support students’ written responses
•Recognise how to build consistency in approaches to writing across a department
•Take practical next steps to improve students’ confidence and accuracy in scientific writing

Background: In my current role, I work with a wide range of schools, often in areas of high deprivation, where scientific writing is frequently identified as a key barrier to success at Key Stage 4. A common challenge is that writing is addressed too late, rather than being deliberately developed across Key Stage 3.
I have developed and delivered CPD on scientific writing through Ark Curriculum Plus, working with partner schools to embed disciplinary literacy within science curricula. This builds on over ten years of classroom experience teaching science in diverse contexts. My approach draws on this work with departments, supporting both leaders and teachers to align curriculum sequencing, pedagogy, and assessment to improve students’ written responses.

Embark on a hands-on adventure and join marine biologists in their quest to uncover the mystery of Luna's father! Meet Luna, an adorable whale calf,  and become part of a passionate team determined to solve this heart-warming puzzle using gel electrophoresis and DNA fingerprinting.

Subject Knowledge for Physics Teaching (SKPT) courses are delivered by The Ogden Trust in partnership with STEM Learning and are fully funded by the Department for Education, to provide free physics professional development for teachers teaching physics outside their specialism.

Delivered by an expert practitioner in a supportive learning community, teachers build their competence and confidence to bring physics to life in the classroom.

The programme is delivered in a range of formats that best meet the needs and requirements of schools and teachers.

Pop into this taster session to find out more about how this course could enhance your science teaching career pathway to teach physics as an additional specialism.

Aims:
- To create a safe space for debate where people can explore their own understanding of gender/sex
- To deconstruct some ideas about classification systems and essentialism.

Objectives:
- To be able to answer the question “What is a woman?”
- To be able to answer pupils’ questions about gender/sex more confidently
- To be able to name and explain several examples of organisms that are outside of the gender/sex binary

In this workshop I will create a space where we are able to debate about gender and sex, we will be looking for the grey areas and discovering how and why things are not always as binary as they seem. Using my gender studies background I will share with you some philosophical ideas about gender/sex and oppression. We will explore how queer nature can be, and share exceptions to the sexual binaries in humans, and many other organisms.

The Gatsby Benchmarks of Good Careers Guidance highlight the importance of linking curriculum learning to careers, yet many teachers face the challenge of fitting meaningful careers education into an already crowded curriculum.
The Scientists Making a Difference book and supporting teaching resources have been created by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, Imperial College London and What on Earth! Books to help schools address this challenge quickly and easily.

The book features 47 diverse scientists working across a wide range of STEM careers, alongside a comprehensive teacher resource pack. Designed for use with students aged 11–16, the resources provide curriculum-linked activities that enable teachers to embed STEM careers into existing science lessons with minimal planning required.
All UK state-funded secondary schools received free copies of the book and teacher resource pack in September 2026. You can also access a digital copy of the teaching resources at www.scientists-making-a-difference.com.
This practical session will introduce attendees to the Scientists Making a Difference resources and demonstrate how they can be used within existing schemes of work. Covering varied lesson activities, worksheets, presentations and curriculum mapping documents, the session will walk you through how the resources can not only help schools in achieving the Gatsby Benchmarks of Good Careers Guidance, but also inspire students through contemporary examples of scientists who’ve undertaken a variety of career pathways.
Attendees will leave with:

• a clear understanding of how to access and use the Scientists Making a Difference resources, to integrate STEM careers education into science lessons.
• Increased confidence in supporting careers education through the curriculum.

There will be opportunities for discussion and questions throughout the session, and attendees will all receive a hard copy of the teacher guide to support implementation within their own schools.

The session is underpinned by the evidence base that informed the Gatsby Benchmarks of Good Careers Guidance, particularly Benchmark 4: Linking Curriculum Learning to Careers. Research has highlighted the importance of helping young people understand the relevance of curriculum subjects to future education and employment pathways. Scientists Making a Difference has been created by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, Imperial College London and What on Earth! publishing to provide practical, curriculum-linked resources that support schools in embedding STEM careers within secondary science teaching.

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries please email [email protected]

Ever wondered how to bring real-world science into your classroom in a meaningful and engaging way? This session introduces Inside Nature, a free resource developed by ZSL that transforms real animal post-mortems into curriculum-linked learning experiences.

You’ll gain insight into the full journey—from veterinary investigation to classroom resource—including the scientific, ethical, and creative decisions involved. Through examples and discussion, we’ll explore how authentic science can enhance engagement, deepen understanding, and make abstract concepts tangible for students.
Whether you’re looking to enrich your curriculum, improve practical engagement, or connect students with real scientific careers, this session will provide inspiration and ready-to-use ideas.

Outcomes: By the end of this session, participants will be able to:
Explain how authentic scientific practices can be adapted into curriculum-aligned resources
Identify effective strategies for using real-world science to enhance student engagement and understanding
Evaluate the use of multimedia approaches (e.g. dissection footage, animation) in supporting learning
Plan how to incorporate similar approaches or resources into their own teaching context

Background: At ZSL, every animal that dies in our care undergoes a post-mortem (necropsy) conducted by specialist veterinary pathologists. These examinations contribute to animal welfare, global research, and the advancement of veterinary knowledge.

Recognising that many secondary schools face barriers to accessing real-world science experiences, ZSL’s Conservation Education team developed Inside Nature. This project bridges classroom learning and authentic scientific practice by transforming real post-mortems into curriculum-linked resources. Drawing on collaboration between educators, scientists, and creative teams, the project translates complex, sensitive material into impactful, accessible teaching tools

Biology is full of phenomena that seem almost unbelievable: fish that shoot jets of water to catch prey, fungi that manipulate insect behaviour, mammals with unusual resistance to disease, plants that trap animals, and organisms capable of remarkable regeneration. Yet these examples are far more than curiosities. Used thoughtfully, they can become powerful tools for teaching fundamental ideas such as adaptation, natural selection, transport, communication, homeostasis, ecology and disease.

This session will showcase a range of striking biological examples most suitable for Key Stages 4 - 5. For each example, participants will consider the core concept it helps to teach, why it is memorable, and how it might be introduced through images, short video clips, questioning, retrieval practice or discussion. Examples will be chosen to show how a single case study can often be adapted for different ages and levels of prior knowledge.
The session will also explore principles for selecting effective examples: ensuring clear curriculum relevance, avoiding novelty for novelty’s sake, linking surprising contexts back to core biological ideas, and using examples to deepen understanding rather than replace it.

Delegates will leave with a bank of ready-to-use examples alongside a practical framework for identifying and evaluating further case studies of their own. Whether teaching GCSE or A-level biology, participants should gain ideas that can be implemented immediately to enrich lessons and strengthen student learning.

As a result of attending, participants will be able to:

• select unusual biological examples that align clearly with curriculum concepts from KS4 to post-16;
• use images, short clips and questioning to turn examples into effective teaching episodes;
• explain how curiosity, relevance and novelty can support memory and engagement;
• adapt examples for different age groups, specifications and levels of prior knowledge;
• identify further case studies that can enrich their own biology curriculum.

This session is grounded in a combination of classroom practice, cognitive science, subject-specific pedagogy and professional reflection.

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries please email [email protected]

The CAR and Shadow CAR reports both highlighted the importance of teaching not just about the causes and impacts of global warming, but also the solutions. Climate change solutions cover both mitigation (reducing the amount of warming) and adaptation to the impacts of the warming. Teaching about solutions links well to green careers, demonstrates the relevance of core curriculum science to real-world issues and can reduce climate anxiety.

In this talk, we will explore a wide range of technological and nature-based solutions to climate change which have clear links to 11-16 biology, chemistry and physics. In particular, we will promote a synoptic teaching approach - climate change is a multi-disciplinary problem that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to both learning and solutions. Systems thinking is key, as the climate system spans school science topics and disciplines, and can be enabled through an awareness of topic sequencing.

We will explore a broad range of solutions, including but not limited to Direct Air Capture, enhanced chemical weathering, the carbon cycle impacts of protecting sea-otters, whales and elephants,  using physics to cool urban areas, as well as exploring why air conditioning is a maladaptation to climate change and tree planting may be a panacea.

This session will explore:
• Teachers and students’ perceptions on the effectiveness of student-led questioning and feedback in engaging students in science.
• Share a more effective model of classroom discourse and how it has enhanced teaching and learning in the science classroom.
• Provide participants opportunities to share ideas and knowledge on pedagogical approaches to authentic assessments and opportunities for collaboration.

To address the underlying concerns regarding students’ learning in science, a more responsive teaching approach and assessments are relevant. This must be student-led to promote self-regulation, feedback, identify areas of weaknesses and support peers in the process (Chen & Chang, 2022). This can be facilitated through a constructivist learning environment where students can collaboratively share knowledge and ideas whilst making meaning from different concepts (EEF, 2024), with added benefits of reducing cognitive load.

This presentation will:
• Share how we trained students to use taxonomy of learning to create questions for their peers through modelling and locating these question types within their epistemological framework for learning (Elby & Hammer, 2010).
• Discuss how the OSLA (2012) model was used to assess and grade students’ presentations and implications on learning.
• Highlight teachers’ roles as facilitators of learning and reviewers of epistemological resources and framing (Elby & Hammer, 2010).
• Discuss how problem-based learning (PBL) was used to develop problems and scenarios used in the study, and how this promoted pedagogy and students’ learning.

By attending the session, participants can learn from the approach to this study as discussed above and would be able to contribute other areas not mentioned, share knowledge and network with others for future research collaboration.

Background information: Working with various secondary schools and teachers has enabled me to provide different types of support ranging from research to pedagogy and linking theory to practice. This presentation is inspired by research conducted in a secondary school with science teachers and their students. At the time, the school was concerned about students’ lack of interests in science and poor outcomes from GCSEs. This became an opportunity for me to conduct research and find possible means to improve teaching and learning at the school. I was familiar with the school due to insider knowledge in the science department and from working with the science teachers. The school was in one of London’s deprived Boroughs where achievements is below the national average and fewer students move on to post-16 let alone studying science subjects at A’ levels and BTEC.

This session will include input from Hitchin School Girls who will give insights and practical tips on how to encourage independent revision for students.

There will be lots of visuals in this practical session with some discussions in smaller groups.

A chance to gets hands-on, and try out some of the latest CLEAPSS practicals.  

Pop in, ask a question, chat with the CLEAPSS advisors!

For queries, please email [email protected]

The recent curriculum review recognised the importance of good quality purposeful practical science. In this workshop we will share the journeys of some of the schools on our Keeping Science Practical project - hear from the schools how they consistently improved practical provision in their own schools (and the impacts of these changes).

Students can often produce correct answers in science - yet struggle when asked to explain, justify, or apply their thinking.

This session explores why this happens, and what teachers can do about it.

Participants will begin by examining real examples of student responses that achieve marks but reveal limited understanding. From this, we will identify key barriers, including over-reliance on recall, weak disciplinary language, and limited experience of constructing explanations.

The session will then focus on practical strategies that have been tested in the classroom, including:

Explicitly modelling how to “think like a scientist”
Teaching students how to build explanations, not just recognise them
Using scaffolds that are deliberately faded to promote independence
Designing questions that reveal and develop thinking, not just check answers

Participants will actively apply these approaches by improving a weak student response and adapting a task for their own context.

The session prioritises clarity, realism, and immediate classroom application. By the end of the session, participants will be able to:

Recognise when students are succeeding without understanding
Diagnose specific weaknesses in students’ scientific thinking
Implement structured approaches to improve explanations and reasoning
Adapt existing tasks to better develop disciplinary thinking

This panel discussion is for all Secondary Science Leaders; experienced, new to and aspiring. Come along and hear from colleagues working at the chalk face who will share their insights into some of the key challenges facing schools and leaders. There will be plenty of opportunity for you to share and discuss the many challenges of leading in Science.

As well as discussing your own successes and challenges, topics are also likely to include:

> Recruitment and retention
> developing your team - planning and leading CPD
> Supporting non-specialists and non-scientists
> Leading curriculum change
> The road ahead for science leadership