ASE 2027 Annual Conference

This interactive workshop introduces a proof-of-concept student toolkit for using spatial computing to support climate change education in primary-aged multicultural settings. The session draws on my doctoral research at the University of Leeds, which examines how spatial computing can be co-developed within a climate change play curriculum with Indonesian and Malaysian children living in the UK.

The aim of the session is to share a research-informed and practice-facing approach to climate change education that is child-centred, culturally responsive and suitable for primary-aged learners. Rather than presenting technology as a novelty, the session considers how virtual reality, augmented reality, digital mapping, LEGO robotics and 3D modelling can help children explore climate change causes, impacts, mitigation and adaptation through active, visual and playful learning.

The session will begin with a short introduction to the research context and the meaning of spatial computing in primary climate change education. I will then share examples from six participatory workshops, showing how children’s discussions, drawings, digital artefacts, mapping activities and reflections shaped the toolkit’s content, learning approaches and activity design. These examples will include children’s use of VR to explore climate-affected environments, digital maps to compare climate issues across countries, LEGO sensors to model environmental systems, and AR/3D modelling to design climate solutions.

The main focus will be the student toolkit developed from the research. By the time of the conference, this toolkit will have been reviewed with children through a co-review workshop. This is not presented as a final validation exercise, but as part of the wider co-development process, where children’s responses help refine the clarity, relevance and usability of the resource.

Participants will examine selected toolkit activities and consider how they might work in primary classrooms, after-school clubs, teacher education or informal learning settings. Using a short feedback template, they will reflect on the toolkit’s climate change content, use of spatial computing, opportunities for children’s participation, cultural responsiveness and practical classroom feasibility.

By the end of the session, participants will be able to identify ways of using spatial computing to support climate change learning, explain how children’s contributions can inform curriculum development, and critically consider how a proof-of-concept toolkit can be adapted for their own educational context.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming how students access information, construct knowledge, and engage with scientific ideas. For science educators, this presents both exciting opportunities and important responsibilities. This session explores how AI can be meaningfully and ethically integrated into science teaching to support inquiry-based learning, deepen conceptual understanding, and strengthen assessment practices across primary and secondary contexts.

Rather than positioning AI as a replacement for traditional teaching approaches, the session emphasises its role as a powerful partner in learning. Participants will explore how AI tools can help students generate hypotheses, visualise abstract processes, interpret data, model scientific phenomena, and refine scientific explanations. Practical classroom examples will demonstrate how AI can scaffold thinking while maintaining the integrity of disciplinary knowledge and scientific reasoning.

A key focus of the session is supporting teachers in developing students’ scientific literacy in an AI-rich environment. As learners increasingly rely on intelligent systems to gather and synthesise information, they must also learn to question sources, evaluate outputs critically, and recognise limitations and bias within AI-generated responses. Strategies will be shared for helping students become reflective users of AI who can distinguish between evidence-based reasoning and plausible but inaccurate outputs.

Participants will also examine how AI can support inclusive science education. AI-powered tools can help differentiate instruction, provide accessible explanations, support multilingual learners, and offer alternative ways for students to demonstrate understanding. Examples will highlight how thoughtful integration of AI can increase participation and confidence among learners who may otherwise feel excluded from science learning.

Assessment is another important dimension addressed in the session. As AI tools become more widely available, educators are reconsidering how to design tasks that promote authentic scientific thinking. The session will present approaches for designing assessments that value process, reasoning, and interpretation over simple recall, while also using AI to support formative feedback and student reflection. These approaches encourage learners to engage more deeply with scientific practices such as modelling, argumentation, and evaluation of evidence.

Ethical considerations will be woven throughout the session, including responsible classroom use, transparency, data awareness, and supporting students to understand how AI systems function. Participants will leave with practical strategies for introducing AI in ways that align with curriculum expectations and uphold professional standards.

This interactive session is designed for educators who are curious about using AI in science education but want practical guidance grounded in pedagogy rather than technology alone. Through discussion, examples, and collaborative reflection, participants will develop confidence in identifying opportunities where AI can enhance—not replace—effective science teaching.

By the end of the session, participants will have concrete ideas they can adapt immediately within their own classrooms and departments to support thoughtful, future-ready science learning.

The session presents a research-informed reconceptualisation of the quadrat through two complementary lenses.
First, informed by Barad’s agential realism and sociomaterial perspectives, we consider how tools actively shape knowledge, attention, and experience. Through iterative design and reflection, we have developed approaches that disrupt conventional ecological practices, incorporating art (e.g. Dürer’s Great Piece of Turf), narrative, and structured noticing to broaden engagement with ecological complexity.

Second, LCT (Maton), particularly its semantic dimension, offers a framework for analysing how learning moves between concrete experiences and abstract concepts. In ecology, this involves shifts between everyday observations and disciplinary language. Examining these shifts across classroom and field contexts helps explain how knowledge and disciplinary understanding develop. This work builds on Sanders and Davies (2023) and aligns with current priorities in science education.

Participant Experience
Participants will rethink the quadrat as a tool for exploring ecosystems, interdependence, scale, and human–environment relationships. Drawing on Barad and Maton, we examine how every pedagogical choice creates an “agential cut,” foregrounding certain aspects of the natural world while excluding others.

Participants will engage with the Toothpick Safari, a flexible, narrative-based alternative to traditional quadrat work. Examples from school and teacher education contexts show how this approach encourages richer discussions about interdependence, multiple scales (micro to macro), deep time, evolution, and human impact.

The session models how uncertainty and open-ended inquiry can be productive in teaching, supporting deeper ecological understanding. Participants will also reflect critically on their own use of tools, tasks, and instructions.

Outcomes - by the end of the session, participants will be able to:

Recognise the agential cuts within their teaching practices

Use quadrats to support narrative, relational, and inquiry-based learning

Design adaptable outdoor activities that prioritise noticing over counting

Explain how material tools shape what counts as knowledge in science

Connect classroom and outdoor learning to support ecological understanding and disciplinary language development.

This session supports teachers, teacher educators, and outdoor learning practitioners to rethink the quadrat as more than a measuring device, positioning it instead as a tool for ecological inquiry. Participants will explore how Karen Barad’s concepts of agential cuts and intra-action can deepen outdoor science learning, and how Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), particularly semantics, helps explain shifts between classroom preparation, fieldwork, and follow-up meaning-making.

Through first-hand, narrative-based approaches, participants will experience alternatives to traditional quadrat activities used with school students and pre-service teachers. The session also invites critical reflection on how teaching decisions influence what students notice, value, and come to understand in ecology.

This work arises from concerns that ecology teaching often prioritises counting and sampling over relationships, meaning-making, and ecological thinking. Drawing on collaborative work across teacher education contexts in London and Gothenburg, involving both pre-service teachers and school students, we began to question the pedagogical role of familiar tools such as quadrats.

Oracy is set to have a renewed emphasis in the revised National Curriculum, but what is the opportunity for oracy in the science classroom? In this keynote, Amy Gaunt will explore what it means to learn to and through talk in science, supporting students to develop their disciplinary knowledge and understanding while also learning to speak, listen and communicate like scientists.

Through discussion and practical activities, delegates will experience oracy in action and consider the opportunities for creating authentic and meaningful contexts for talk across their own science classrooms and departments.

If your focus is teaching or supporting biology lessons, come along for a networking session with complimentary tea/coffee and a muffin, to discuss how Miss Estruch Teach & Tell can support your practice!

This session aims to inspire and equip teachers to think beyond the science curriculum to integrate ways of knowing from science with those from other disciplines, which include philosophy, ethics and worldviews to tackle the challenge of climate change.  This supports the intention of the recent curriculum and assessment review, which aims to help learners understand that global challenges, both social and environmental require attention to scientific knowledge and cultural skills.  

I have taken this approach because as a science teacher of 20 years I realised we give children the scientific skills to tackle problems, but most challenges they will face are not ones that science alone can solve. I now work at the Faraday Institute for Science and Religion, a Cambridge based research and educational institute, where we take the approach that integrating ways of knowing from science with those that consider worldviews, philosophy, ethics helps respond to big questions in a more holistic manner enabling a more effective response. Using this approach, I developed this classroom resource on climate change to help children understand why not everyone is doing everything they can to combat it, as I have taught so many children the science of climate change and they don’t then understand why everyone is not doing everything they can to combat it. It draws on ideas from journals like national geographic and discussion with colleagues.

It will explore the nature of science, through a presentation helping teachers consider the power of science with their learners, but also the limits of science; like those of instruments, timelines, complex systems and the human element and how other ways of knowing, like those from RE, which considers world views, can be helpful for tackling our big questions, like climate change. It will then review the classroom resource on climate change and this will lead into a discussion of the opportunities and challenges of this approach.

It will give you ideas and resources to help learners to consider how an individual's world view can be more important in motivating them to act or not act in response to climate change than being presented with the science and how to respond to this constructively. This will help you manage topics that can open discussions that can be emotive and challenging, encouraging you to embrace this aspect of science learning and develop wider skills in your students; It will help learners to develop oracy and debating skills. It is suitable for learners from all phases, but specifically those at KS2 and 3, covering key parts of the curriculum, but will also appeal to teachers supporting students in extracurricular activities, like science debating clubs.

This professional registration lunch (by invitation only) is for those Honorary ASE members and member-science teachers and technicians who have gained professional registration or Chartership: CSciTeach, RSci or RSciTech, all of whom are invited to join Lynn Ladbrook, the ASE's CEO along with the Chair Trio for the Association.

New Honorary members will also be announced. Honorary Membership is the ASE's highest honour and is awarded to those individuals that have made outstanding contributions to the work of the ASE in at least two of the following areas:
National affairs of the Association
Regional affairs of the Association
Science education in general (at a national or international level)

This workshop draws on our experience of co-writing the primary science curriculum, teacher guides, pupil books and designing teacher training in the Kingdom of Tonga, a Pacific island nation with a rich culture that is vulnerable to climate change.  

In this workshop we will also draw on the expertise of the science educators in Tonga, whose voices will be included by video recording. The work was funded by The World Bank as part of  larger collaboration between Tonga’s Ministry for Education and Training and The Curriculum Foundation.

In this engaging workshop combining activity and dialogue we will:
> Explain the internationally used 5E framework for active learning and how it is supported by educational neuroscience
> Explore alternatives to screen-led teaching and how we can support oracy - developing scientific vocabulary and dialogue
> Expand perspectives by sharing what we have learned about curriculum design and pedagogy through co–designing primary science curriculum and pedagogy for the Kingdom of Tonga: a Pacific island nation with a culture of humility, humour and ‘talanoa’ (dialogue).
> Invite the audience to reflect on how these insights might inform their own teaching.

Participants will leave the session with:
> A framework for progressive planning
> Ideas for developing oracy
> An enriched view of science education in a global world
> Questions about the potential for pupil books as an alternative to screens

Kendra is best known for researching primary science education, currently drawing together educational neuroscience with research in science education and dialogic talk. Philippa is a highly regarded writer of science learning and teaching materials, with considerable experience of leading change internationally. Both are experienced at leading teacher professional development.

2026 saw issues of equity, diversity and inclusion thrust violently into the academic and educational spotlight. EDI has been the subject of intense, polarised and painful debate across national and international media, with events that have shaken the academic world to devastating effect.
This presidential address explores the motive of what it means to talk/ speak about equity within science education. It engages with a range of discursive challenges relating to equity issues, spanning resistance to equity through the accusation that “you can’t say anything these days”, to the practical dilemmas that STEM educators may encounter, such as not knowing ‘what you can or can’t say’, through to issues of ‘voice’ and injustice and whose voices are valued, recognised or marginalised and excluded within STEM learning spaces.
The presentation concludes with some possibilities for supporting greater equity, justice and inclusion in and through science education and how educators might speak more justly and productively about equity issues.

Our dedicated Chair Trio invite you to drop-in to the “Chair-Chat” sessions on one of the days of Annual Conference 2027. The Chair is a vital role to the ASE, and the elected Chair provides an authoritative voice for the thousands of members that the ASE supports, along with those working within the wider science education community. Those elected remain part of our Chair Trio for 3 years.

Got a question? Ever wondered about what goes on behind the scenes? Ever thought about getting involved in Committee activities? Are you wanting to know more about Professional Registration or writing an article in one of the ASE journals? First time attending our flagship Conference?

If this is your first ASE Conference, then please come along and say Hello.

We look forward to hearing your questions and will endeavour to answer them or point you in a selection of possible right directions!

My aim with this session is to:
• raise awareness of students’ epistemological beliefs;
• discuss how these beliefs influence students’ participation and engagement; and
• illustrate how these beliefs can be supported towards a more sophisticated understanding through STEM educational practices.

Recent studies in Denmark have shown that students in many cases associate acquisition of scientific knowledge with passive memorization of facts and scientific concepts. I will address the challenges arising from this research and introduce a framework for understanding the concept of epistemological beliefs. This will be used to highlight the findings of a case study I conducted in an eighth-grade physics class in Denmark.

My hope is that the participants will gain a more complex understanding of students’ conception of scientific knowledge and of what we’re teaching the students about science besides the concepts, methods and practices. This will enable the participants to identify indicators of epistemological beliefs among their own students and to discuss initiatives to support more sophisticated beliefs about knowledge, knowing and learning in their own classrooms.

I completed my master’s thesis on this subject at the University of Copenhagen, where I recently finished my master’s degree in STEM education. I investigated this topic through research into academic literature and a case study in a lower secondary school class, where I conducted observations in a STEM physics course and did three semi-structured interviews with six students.

Our society is facing technological advancement, environmental challenges, and evolving labour market demands. As such, science education is increasingly expected to equip young people with the knowledge, skills, and dispositions needed to deal with these issues and thrive in an uncertain future. Science teachers are at the forefront of this effort, adapting curricula, pedagogies, and assessment practices to prepare students for a complex and interconnected world.
 
The panel discussion will explore how the global science teaching workforce is responding to these challenges and opportunities. Drawing on international perspectives, it will examine the ways teachers are fostering critical thinking, real world problem-solving, creativity, scientific literacy, collaboration, inquiry-based learning, sustainability, digital technologies, and adaptability essential for future readiness. This includes highlighting how science educators are empowering learners not only to succeed academically, but also to contribute meaningfully to their communities and address global challenges. The discussion will reflect on the pivotal role of the science teaching profession in shaping resilient, informed, and engaged citizens who are prepared to thrive in the future and help create it.

CASTME Awards:  CASTME’s mission is to raise the general level of STEM education in commonwealth countries and beyond. They support and promote education at all levels, working in partnership with schools, colleges, civil society organisations and industry across the world. Their awards scheme recognises innovation, awareness raising, and sustainability across science education.